Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Senate committee attacks gay man, leave hetero alone...
So, what Larry Craig did brought discredit upon the Senate? I don't disagree with that. The question I would like to have answered is "Why are you letting Vitter off the hook?" Apparently, the Senate is OK with paid female hookers and not OK with no-cash man on man sex.PageOneQ via AP: Senate Ethics Committee Says Idaho Sen. Larry Craig Acted Improperly in Men's Room Sex Sting:
The Senate Ethics Committee said Wednesday that Idaho Sen. Larry Craig acted improperly in connection with a men's room sex sting last year and had brought discredit on the Senate.Craig is bummed out and has no problem "disagreeing" with the truth, or so says Mr. I Am Not Gay:
In a letter to the Republican senator, the ethics panel said Craig's attempt to withdraw his guilty plea after his arrest at a Minneapolis airport was an effort to evade legal consequences of his own actions.
Craig's actions constitute "improper conduct which has reflected discreditably on the Senate," the letter said.
In an e-mailed statement, Craig told The Associated Press he disagreed with the ethics panel's action.Everytime Craig says "Idaho" I think, "No, actually YOU-da-ho!"
"While I am disappointed and strongly disagree with the conclusions reached by the Senate Ethics Committee, from the outset I have encouraged the committee to act in a timely fashion and they have done so. I will continue to serve the people of Idaho," he said.
By: Michael Rogers
|